Proto-rəgyam
Phonology
Consonants
m | n | ɲ ⟨ny⟩ | ŋ ⟨ng⟩ | |
ɓ ⟨b'⟩ | ɗ ⟨d'⟩ | | | |
b | d | ɟ ⟨j⟩ | g | |
p | t | c | k | ʔ ⟨'⟩ |
pʰ ⟨ph⟩ | tʰ ⟨th⟩ | cʰ ⟨ch⟩ | kʰ ⟨kh⟩ | |
| s | | | h |
| ɾ l ⟨r l⟩ | | | | | | |
w | | j ⟨y⟩ | | |
⟨'⟩ is omitted at the start of words.
Vowels
Major Syllables
Monophthongs
The following monophthongs can be short:
i | ɨ ⟨iu⟩ | u |
e ⟨ei⟩ | ɘ ⟨eu⟩ | o ⟨ou⟩ |
ɛ ⟨e⟩ | ɜ ⟨eo⟩ | ɔ ⟨o⟩ |
æ ⟨ae⟩ | | ɑ ⟨a⟩ |
or long:
iː ⟨ii⟩ | ɨː ⟨iiu⟩ | uː ⟨uu⟩ |
eː ⟨eei⟩ | ɘː ⟨eeu⟩ | oː ⟨oou⟩ |
ɛː ⟨ee⟩ | ɜː ⟨eeo⟩ | ɔː ⟨oo⟩ |
æː ⟨aae⟩ | | ɑː ⟨aa⟩ |
Diphthongs
All diphthongs are long:
æi ⟨aei⟩ | æɨ ⟨aeiu⟩ | æu ⟨aeu⟩ |
ɑi ⟨ai⟩ | ɑɨ ⟨aiu⟩ | ɑu ⟨au⟩ |
Stressed Minor Syllables
Unstressed Minor Syllables
Tones/Registers
There are five tones/registers, low ⟨àa⟩, low/breathy ⟨âa⟩, mid ⟨aa⟩, high ⟨áa⟩, and high/creaky ⟨ãa⟩.
Stress
Primary stress always falls on the final syllable of a word. Words have an iambic structure, with alternating unstressed and stressed syllables, and words with an even number of syllables start with an unstressed syllable while words with an odd number of syllables start with a stressed syllable.
In minor syllables, [i] and [ɪ] reflect the same phoneme /ɪ/, [ɨ] (close) and [ɨ] (near-close) reflect the same phoneme /ɨ/, [u] and [ʊ] reflect the same phoneme /ʊ/, and [a] and [ɐ] reflect the same phoneme /ɐ/, differing only in that the former are stressed and the latter are unstressed. Note that the choice of whether to call these phonemes the stressed version or the unstressed versions phonemically is rather arbitrary; I have chosen to call them the unstressed versions to differentiate them from the phonemes found in major syllables and because these are the default, being found in the more common disyllabic as opposed to polysyllabic words.
Word Structure
Words have the structure [(CV1)CV2]C({ɾ l})V3({p t k m n ŋ}), where V1 are the vowels found in stressed minor syllables, V2 are the vowels found in unstressed minor syllables, and V3 is the vowels found in major syllables.
Morphosyntax
Basics
The basic sentence structure is topic-comment, SV/AVO, with noun-relative, noun-genitive, noun-determiner, and verb-adverb orders.
The two basic word classes are nouns and adverbs, along with an assortment of various particles. Verbs take the roles that adjectives, adpositions, and adverbs take in many other languages, and relative clauses and serial verb constructions are used very heavily to enable this.
There is prefixing morphology used for word derivation, e.g. the prefix kɐ- used to derive causative verbs and the prefix ʔɐ- used to derive agent nouns.
Clause Structure
Clause have the following structure:
- Introductory particle
- Topic
- Coverbs
- Coverb objects
- Main verbal complex
- Non-topic core arguments
- Coverbs
- Coverb objects
Word order is rather free, with both the agent and object being able to be placed before and after the main verbal complex, as can a non-core argument topic. Topics may be any noun phrase in a clause; if the topic is not a core argument of the main verb it is replaced in its original location with a demonstrative. In main clauses only one argument may precede the main verb complex and any coverbs preceding the main verb complex; any other core arguments must come after the main verb complex. True adverbs may be placed directly after the main verb complex or may be located later in the clause, and coverbs, including ones that are primarily adverbial in function, and their objects normally are placed after any core arguments of the main verb. Normally coverbs and their arguments are placed after the main verbal complex and the non-topic core argument, but sometimes they may be placed before it, particular with regard to motion coverbs that are conceptually before the main verb or stative verbs that modify any other coverbs before the main verb in addition to the main verb.
Vocatives may be located anywhere in a sentence, even though they tend to be located at the beginning of a sentence, and are introduced with the particle ʔɑ́ followed by the vocative argument.
By default the agent of a transitive verb is the core argument that is higher on the person (1 > 2 > 3), animacy (human/god/force of nature > non-human animate > inanimate), and topicality (more topical > less topical) hierarchies, in that order, unless the inverse marker is present, where then the opposite is true.
The man killed a tiger.
The tiger was killed by a man.
The man was killed by a tiger.
The tiger killed a man.
Arguments of nominalized verbs are specified by making the argument an inalienable possessor. For transitive verbs by default this argument will be the patient except for patient nouns; to specify an agent for a nominalized transitive noun other than a patient noun the verb is marked as being antipassive.
The tiger is a man-killer.
The man died in a tiger-killing.
The dead pig is a tiger's kill.
The following particles introduce clauses:
hí |
lǣ |
nɑ̰ |
hæ̀ |
ɗi̤ |
wɛ̤ |
bō |
jè |
ŋū |
The nominal relativizer/interrogative particle is always followed by the appropriate classifier. Subclauses except for attributive relative clauses are preferentially placed at the end of the containing clause, even if it means changing the overall word order from that which is normally preferred.
The tiger ate the pig farmer's pig because they were lazy.
Who will the tiger eat?
The tiger eats what it wants.
Non-Core Argument Topicalization Syntax
When non-core arguments are topicalized, the argument is moved to the start of the clause, a proximal demonstrative is left in its original place, and the original initial core argument is moved after the main verb complex; note that this results in two core arguments being after the main verb complex in the case of transitive verbs, and the order of these does still determine their relative topicalization with respect to the person/animacy/topicalization hierarchy. Take, for instance:
It is the house that I walked towards.
It is the woman that I gave the box to.
Question Syntax
Yes/no questions are introduced with wɛ̤, which takes the position before the main verb complex and any core arguments, which are moved after the main verb complex:
Did you eat the food?
Nominal wh-questions where the wh-argument is not a qualified noun are introduced with nɑ̰, followed by a classifier, which take the position before the main verb complex and any core arguments, which are moved after the main verb complex:
What did you eat?
A proximal demonstrative is inserted when the nominal wh-argument is not a core argument:
Who did you give the box to?
Non-nominal wh-questions are introduced with particles such as jè, which take the position before the main verb complex and any core arguments, which are moved after the main verb complex:
How do you like the food?
Nominal wh-questions where the wh-argument is a qualified noun have the qualified noun moved to the head of the sentence and qualified with a following ʔɔ́ɔ, and any other core arguments are moved after the main verb complex, as in:
What food do you like?
As with non noun-qualifying nominal wh-questions, if the qualified noun is not a core argument a proximal demonstrative is inserted in its original location:
Which woman did you give the box to?
Dative Syntax
Dative statements and statements with ditransitive arguments resulting from the use of applicatives with transitive verbs have the following general syntax: agent aux take-action patient give-action indirect-object evidential. Examples include:
I gave food to the pig.
I carried the food and gave it to the pig.
I said that to my mother.
Movement Syntax
Movement statements have the following general syntax: subject aux movement-action to/from/through location-type location evidential. Examples include:
They walked over there.
The mother is carrying her baby through the field.
Comparison Syntax
Comparative statements have the following syntax: subject aux bɨ-stative-verb hō compared-object evidential. Examples include:
The mountain is taller than the hill.
It is the bear that the bird is faster than.
Resultative Syntax
There are two types of resultative, one where a state is a result of an event taking place where the event is closely tied to the state, and the other where a state is the result of an event specified by a separate transitive verb taking place. The latter are similar to normal serial verb constructions, except that the subject of the result state is the object of the main verb. The former have the syntax: subject aux ʔɪ-stative-verb evidential. The latter have the syntax: agent aux main-verb patient ʔɪ-stative-verb evidential. Examples include:
The sky grew dark.
The tiger mauled the pig to death.
Note that the causative of a stative verb takes on a resultative meaning with regard to the patient of the causative verb, as in:
The farmer filled the trough.
This can also be used without an agent in a passive fashion, similar to a normal resultative, except indicating that it was due to some agent:
The house got cleaned.
Contrast this with the use of ʔɪ-, which does not imply the existence of any agent:
The house became clean.
Verbal Morphosyntax
All verbs are present/imperfective by default, and any other TAM is determined by auxiliary verbs.
Verbal Complex
- Nominal derivation prefix
- Negative auxiliary verb
- Inchoative/cessative/continuative auxiliary verb
- Tense/perfectivity auxiliary verb
- Modal auxiliary verb(s)
- Negative auxiliary verb (when it is the verb referred to by a modal verb that is being negated rather than the modal verb itself)
- Preceding coverbs
- Preceding coverb arguments
- Verbal derivation prefix
- Main verb
- Inverse marker
Evidential coverbs are not part of the verb complex, and come after the object, and even after other coverbs.
Derivation
mɪ- |
lʊ- |
kɐ- |
ʔɪ- |
hɨ- |
dɐ- |
bɨ- |
ɾʊ- |
ɓɪ- |
nɪ- |
lɐ- |
tɨ- |
ʔɐ- |
mɨ- |
sʊ- |
ɾɐ- |
Note that derivation prefixes such as the antipassive voice and causative voice prefixes can be combined; mikɐ-/mɪka- only marks the causer and no causee or object, whereas with transitive verbs kamɪ-/kɐmi- marks both the causer and the causee but not the object, as in:
I killed.
I fed the tiger.
Objects of causative verbs are marked with the coverb sæ̤u, as in:
I fed the tiger the pig.
Auxiliary and Modal Verbs
Auxiliary Verbs
cʰɑ̄ |
dɨ́ |
lɔ̤ |
ɓée |
nɜ̰ |
ɾɛ̰ɛ |
nù |
jí |
Past and future perfective)auxiliaries are frequently combined with inchoative or cessative auxiliaries, and past and future imperfective auxiliaries are frequently combined with the continuative auxiliary, as in:
I started to eat a pig.
I will still be eating a pig.
Note that inchoative and cessative auxiliaries can be combined with past and future imperfective auxiliaries as well, as in:
I was starting to eat a pig.
I will be finishing eating a pig.
The negative auxiliary can go both before or after inchoative, cessative, and continuative auxiliaries, to specify whether it is the auxiliary being negated or the main verb being negated, as in:
I am not starting to eat a pig.
I am starting to not eat a pig.
The negative auxiliary can negate coverbs, unlike other auxiliaries that may only qualify the main verb. However, this is only done when it is specifically the coverb which is being negated, and not the clause as a whole. Take, for instance:
The farmer raises pigs, unlike his lord.
The negative coverb can also negative stative verbs being used without a relativizer, as in:
The fearless farmer stared down the tiger.
Modal Verbs
kɾí |
ʔḭ |
cɛ́ɛ |
nɑ̄ɨ |
mè |
dó |
tʰæ̤ |
blɑ́ |
ʔɔ̰t |
Auxiliary verbs and modal verbs can be ordered such that auxiliaries or modals precede that which they qualify, and both multiple modal verbs and multiple auxiliary verbs, and even in cases multiples of the same modal or auxiliary verb may be present, as in:
I was not able to not eat a pig.
Adverbial Particles
nɨ̄ |
ɓɑ̤u |
ɗæ̤i |
lɑ̄i |
jɑ̤n |
ɗɔ́m |
wǽi |
pʰṵ |
These are usually placed immediately after the verb they qualify, before any arguments to that verb, as in:
I will be eaten by a tiger.
Evidential Coverbs
mæ̀ |
sí |
kɑ̤ |
tʰɛ̀ |
ɗṵ |
tōo |
These usually are placed at the end of a clause, unless there are any complement clauses, where then they are placed immediately before the complement clause or, if the complement clause is the argument of a coverb, the coverb the complement clause is an argument of, as in:
(I deduced that) you should kill the tiger, because you may be eaten by the tiger.
Nominal Morphosyntax
Nouns, pronouns aside, are not marked for number or definiteness. However, collectives are expressed via reduplication of the first syllable of the major syllable. Numbers are associated with classifiers, which follow numbers. Also there is some nominal derivation to form nouns and verbs from nouns.
* Reduplication takes the form of a minor syllable with the first consonant of the major syllable and a near-open front, central, or back vowel for any close or close-mid vowel in the major syllable or a near-open central vowel for any open or open-mid vowel in the major syllable.
Transitive relative clauses are introduced with hí, and intransitive relative clauses come before transitive relative clauses.
Two groups of tigers in the field are eating pigs.
Derivation
REDUP |
jʊ- |
gɐ- |
cɨ- |
hɐ- |
tʊ- |
bɪ- |
lɪ- |
bɨ- |
ʔɨ- |
ŋɪ- |
kɨ- |
The big tiger ate the pig farmer in the pig farm.
Demonstratives and Other Determiners
The demonstratives and other determiners below also act in the place of third-person pronouns.
Demonstratives and other determiners are normally associated with classifiers when used pronominally.
Demonstratives may take the comparative and superlative prefixes that intransitive verbs can take.
ɡɑ̄ |
mo̰ |
lɨ́ |
ɟū |
ʔɔ́ɔ |
mɛ̀ |
ŋæ̀ |
lú |
jo̰ |
ʔǣɨ |
nɔ̤ |
cæ̀ |
kɛ̤ |
sū |
pæ̤ |
Note that proximal and distal demonstratives and possessive determiners can be combined with other determiners.
(I heard that) the tigers are eating the group of pigs there.
Possessive Determiners
Earlier on possessive determiners are only used for attributive inalienable possessors. Alienable and predicative possessors in earlier Proto-rəgyam rather are expressed with the dative/benefactive/genitive verb ʔɛ̰ɛ.
ɗí | ŋæ̀ |
- | tɪŋæ̀ |
ɲó | tē |
ʔṵ | sɜ̀n |
(I heard that) my father killed the tiger.
Third person inalienable possessors are expressed by placing the possessor, which must be present (pronominal possession being expressed via a demonstrative), after, depending on the number of the possessor, ʔṵ or sɜ̀n, as in:
The pig farmer's son fed the pigs.
In later Proto-rəgyam alienable possessive determiners developed; these have the following forms, derived from the personal pronouns prefixed with hɪ-, itself derived from the relativizer hí.
hɪʔɛ́k | hɪʔṵn |
- | hɪnṵn |
hɪhɑ̀ | hɪnɔ́ |
There are also third person possession markers, unmarked for number, in later Proto-rəgyam, derived from hɪ- prefixing the dative ʔɛ̰ɛ:
Coordinating Conjunctions
Note that when strung together, each individual NP is separated by a coordinating conjunction, unlike in English.
The farmer fed the cat, the dog, and the pigs.
Classifiers
Classifiers are placed immediately after cardinal numbers, demonstrative pronouns, other pronouns derived from determiners, and the nominal relativizer/interrogative particle. They are also optionally placed after determiners other than possessive determiners.
kǣ |
gɛ̤ɛ |
lɘ̄ |
mḛ |
bɑ̰ |
cʰɑ́ |
mɘ̤ |
ʔíi |
cík |
ɟæ̀u |
cæ̰i |
ɗǣɨ |
múu |
lɘ̰ |
ɓɜ̤ |
dɾɔ̰ɔ |
lǽk |
sɑ́u |
hṳu |
hæ̀ |
lé |
jḛ |
ɾó |
ʔɨ̰ɨ |
dɨ̤ |
sɔ̄m |
bǽŋ |
tæ̀ |
nɨ̄ŋ |
kʰù |
sɛ̤k |
mɑ́t |
hì |
tʰɛ̄ɛ |
ɗɜ̤ɜn |
lɑ́i |
cɑ̀p |
pím |
The pig farmer has a hundred pigs over there.
What are all (of those) animals?
Pronouns
Personal Pronouns
The demonstratives serve as the third-person pronouns, but there are also the following first and second-person pronouns:
Third Person and Non-Personal Pronouns
Demonstratives and other determiners, combined with classifiers, are used without nouns as third person and non-personal pronouns, as in:
They (low) came and killed the pigs and ate them.
Registers
2nd person pronouns and demonstratives are commonly followed by the high-status classifier cʰɑ́ to form a respectful pronoun for speaking to another person or about another person of higher status. Likewise, 1st person pronouns are commonly followed by the low-status classifier mɘ̤ to form a humble pronoun for when speaking to another person of higher status. For example:
You (high) are not a pig farmer like me (low).
The high-status classifier cʰɑ́ and the low-status classifier mɘ̤ can be placed after arbitrary nouns referring to people even without any associated number or determiner to indicate respect (of a higher status) or despectiveness, as in:
The lord (high) owns the land that the peasant (low) farms.